There are several different types of usage metric in Counter 5, which break down into investigations and requests. An investigation is tracked when a user performs any action in relation to a content item or title, while a request is specifically related to viewing or downloading the full content item.
Total_Item_Investigations - the total number of times a content item or information related to a content item was accessed. It includes the following -
Viewing an abstract
Linking to a link resolver
Viewing cited references
Linking to an ILL form
Viewing html full-text
Viewing the PDF
Watching a video
Viewing an article preview
Total Item Investigations is a good metric for citation databases not known for full-text, such as Cinahl, since users may interact with it more looking at abstracts, or clicking out to a link resolver to get full-text elsewhere, or ordering via a built-in ILL form.
Unique_Item_Investigations - the number of unique content items (e.g. chapters) investigated by a user.
Unique_Title_Investigations - the number of unique titles (e.g. books) investigated by a user.
Total_Item_Requests - the total number of times the full text of a content item was downloaded or viewed.
Unique_Item_Requests - the number of unique content items (e.g. chapters) requested by a user. This eliminates the duplication built into Total Item Requests when someone pulls up the html, and then pulls a pdf of the same article in the same session. These numbers will likely be lower than Total Item Requests.
Unique_Title_Requests - the number of unique titles (e.g. books) requested by a user.
Key Point - Accessing an item as full-text counts as both a request AND an investigation (an expression of interest).
Scenarios - Investigations & RequestsSusan is researching the history of antibiotics on Publisher Platform Alpha. From a list of search results, she opens three article abstracts and a video record. All four records are different, but two of the articles are from the same journal. The counts are -
After reading the abstracts, Susan downloads the PDFs for two of the articles, both from the same journal. The counts change to:
|
Susan is researching the history of antibiotics on Publisher Platform Alpha. She runs a search for “history AND antibiotics”. The counts are:
Searches_Regular: 1
Searches_Automated: 0
Searches_Platform: 1
Searches_Federated: 0
For a database like this, the cost per use calculation may be related to searches rather than to full-text downloads; this varies according to individual library practice.
Susan is researching the history of antibiotics on Publisher Platform Alpha, which includes multiple databases. She runs a search for “history AND antibiotics”. The counts are:
Searches_Regular: 0
Searches_Automated: 1
Searches_Platform: 1
Searches_Federated: 0
Susan then selects the ‘History of Medicine’ database and reruns her search. The counts are:
Searches_Regular: 1
Searches_Automated: 1
Searches_Platform: 2
Searches_Federated: 0
In a separate session, Susan uses an API to search Publisher Platform Alpha. The count for that activity is:
Searches_Regular: 0
Searches_Automated: 0
Searches_Platform: 0
Searches_Federated: 1
Coverage is from 09/01/2019 - 08/31/2024
The above data comes from the Database Master Report and includes the most used databases.
NOTE - some Ebsco data from 8/2022 is missing, per report from Ebsco.
©2022 Houston Community College Libraries